I was listening to an audio where Bernard explain that the only choice we have is choosing between the option that are available to us within our preprogram accepted reality.
Since every thought that we have can only be generated within the limit of our programming, what we have is nothing close to free will.
A real free will would not be subject to limitation.
He also mention in another audio that the only 2 options that we have are choosing between self interest or what is best for all.
Now it seems to me that the other challenge that we are facing is that even our conception of a world that is best for all is subject to our programming, therefore it's easy to have an opinion about what is best without really knowing how reality operate. For this reason, the process become the way to get out of the fog of self-interest and become a living example of what's best.
I forgive myself that I have accepted and allowed myself to think that I have free will
I forgive myself that I have accepted and allowed myself to think wanting to have the right for MY opinion and discarding what is best, is self-interest based
I forgive myself that I have accepted and allowed myself to not realize that what is best is not rooted in opinion but in common sense and consider how reality operate.
I forgive myself that I have accepted and allowed myself to not realize that the only 2 options that I have are choosing between what is best or self-interest
I forgive myself that I have accepted and allowed myself to not realize that the mind will always choose self-interest, because what is best is perceive as a threat for the mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment